SERVED AUG. 4, 1995
ORDER PROHIBITING SUSPENSION OF SERVICE
Essential air service at | | TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA | Docket 50381 | under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. |
Background
On June 2, 1995, Flagship Airlines, Inc., d/b/a American Eagle, filed a 90-day notice of intent to suspend its unsubsidized service at Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as of September 5, 1995. American Eagle currently operates three round trips a day between Tuscaloosa and Nashville -- two nonstop and one via Columbus, Mississippi -- with 19-seat Jetstream 31 aircraft.1 It is the only carrier providing scheduled service at the community.
On July 19, 1995, the City of Tuscaloosa filed an objection to American Eagle's notice, and requested that the Department require American Eagle to maintain service at the community.2
Decision
American Eagle's suspension of service would leave Tuscaloosa without any scheduled air service. In this situation, 49 U.S.C. 41734 requires that we prohibit American Eagle from suspending service at the community for 30 days beyond the end of the 90-day notice period, through October 4, 1995. In doing so, we will require American Eagle to maintain its current level of service as described above.
Carrier Replacement Proposals
We will also seek proposals, with or without subsidy requests, from carriers interested in providing replacement service at Tuscaloosa. As last established by Order 94-5-6, May 6, 1994, Tuscaloosa's essential air service determination requires at least two nonstop or one-stop round trips each service day to either Atlanta or Nashville providing a minimum of 67 seats in each direction.3 As we discussed in that order, however, the minimum-seat guarantee was based on traffic levels during a period when Tuscaloosa received service to two hubs: in addition to American Eagle's service to Nashville, the community also received service to Atlanta by GP Express Airlines, Inc. Shortly before GP Express's suspension of service in mid-1994, we concluded that American Eagle's remaining capacity would probably be sufficient to meet demand. Subsequent experience has shown this to be the case. As a general matter, we are prepared to consider proposals that would provide the community with three round trips each service day to Atlanta, Nashville, or any other suitable hub, with 15- to 19-seat aircraft, or two round trips a day with larger aircraft.4
Service and Traffic Histories
American Eagle has been providing service at Tuscaloosa for many years. During its tenure, Tuscaloosa-Nashville traffic peaked at 39.3 enplanements per service day in 1993.5 Traffic in the market has declined slightly since then. During the year ended March 31, 1995, the most recent 12-month period for which data are available, Tuscaloosa-Nashville traffic averaged 32.1 enplanements per service day.
As noted above, Tuscaloosa has also received service to Atlanta. Prior to GP Express, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc., operated unsubsidized Tuscaloosa-Atlanta service. During the late 1980s, ASA's traffic to Atlanta rivaled or exceeded American Eagle's to Nashville; in 1989, for example, Tuscaloosa averaged 31.4 enplanements per service day to Atlanta and 22.3 to Nashville. Afterwards, however, ASA's traffic declined. In July 1990, ASA filed notice to suspend service, and the Department subsidized ASA's hold-in service until June 1992, when ASA was replaced by GP Express.6 During its two years in the market, GP Express averaged about ten enplanements per service day. Primarily because of those poor traffic results, the Department decided to discontinue subsidy for GP Express's service to Atlanta, to rely on American Eagle's remaining service to Nashville to meet the community's essential air service requirements, and to allow GP Express to terminate service as of July 1, 1994.
Procedures for Filing Replacement Proposals
For interested carriers unfamiliar with our procedures and recommended form for supplying the necessary information, we have prepared two explanatory documents that we will make available upon request. The first describes the process for handling carrier replacement cases under 49 U.S.C. 41734(f), and discusses in detail the process of requesting proposals, conducting reviews of applicants, and selecting a replacement carrier. The second is an evidence request containing an explanatory statement, a copy of Part 204 of our regulations (14 CFR 204), and schedules setting forth our recommended form for submitting data required for calculating compensation and determining the financial and operational ability of applicants to provide reliable essential air service. (Section 204.4 describes the fitness information required of all applicants for authority to provide essential air service.) Applicant carriers that have already submitted this information in another case need only resubmit it if a substantial change has occurred. However, if there are more recent data or if there have been any changes to the information on file, carriers should provide updates of those information elements. Interested carriers that need to obtain copies of these documents may contact the Office of Aviation Analysis at (202) 366-1053.
Other Carrier Requirements
The Department is responsible for implementing various Federal statutes governing lobbying activities, drug-free workplaces, and nondiscrimination.7 Consequently, all carriers receiving Federal subsidy to support essential air service must certify that they are in compliance with Department regulations regarding drug-free workplaces and nondiscrimination, and those carriers whose subsidies exceed $100,000 over the life of the rate term must also certify that they are in compliance with the regulations governing lobbying activities. All carriers that plan to submit proposals involving subsidy should submit the required certifications along with their proposals. Interested carriers requiring more detailed information regarding these requirements as well as copies of the certifications should contact the Office of Aviation Analysis at (202) 366-1053. The Department is prohibited from paying subsidy to carriers that do not submit these documents.
Community and State Comments
The community and state are welcome to submit comments on the proposals at any time. Comments on the proposals' strengths and weaknesses would be particularly helpful, and the civic parties may also express a preference for a particular carrier, if they choose. In any event, after conducting rate conferences with all applicants, we will provide a summary of the conference results to the civic parties and ask them to file their final comments.8
This order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56(i).
ACCORDINGLY,
MARK L. GERCHICK Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs(SEAL)